Importancia del seguimiento de lesiones melanocíticas con dermatoscopia digital para el diagnóstico temprano de melanoma
Barra lateral del artículo
Contenido principal del artículo
Resumen
La dermatoscopia digital es una herramienta que permite el diagnóstico de melanomas en estadios tempranos, por medio del seguimiento de las lesiones pigmentarias a largo plazo. Se comunican tres casos de pacientes con alto riesgo de melanoma, en los cuales ‒a través del seguimiento con dermatoscopia digital‒ se realizó el diagnóstico de la enfermedad mediante la detección de cambios morfológicos, arquitecturales y de pigmentación de las lesiones estudiadas.
Downloads
Detalles del artículo
Sección
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0.
Cómo citar
Referencias
Rigel DS. Epiluminescence microscopy in clinical diagnosis of pigmented skin lesions?. Lancet. 1997; 349:1566-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(05)61625-X
Argenziano G, Soyer HP. Dermoscopy of pigmented skin lesions- a valuable tool for early diagnosis of melanoma. Lancet Oncol. 2001; 2:443-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(00)00422-8
Haenssle HA, Korpas B, Hansen-Hagge C, et al. Selection of patients for long-term surveillance with digital dermoscopy by assessment of melanoma risk factors. Arch Dermatol. 2010; 146:257-64. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1001/archdermatol.2009.370
Malvehy J, Puig S. Follow-up of melanocytic skin lesions with digital total-body photography and digital dermoscopy: a two-step method. Clin Dermatol. 2002; 20:297-304. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0738-081X(02)00220-1
Salerni G, Terán T, Puig S, et al. Meta-analysis of digital dermoscopy follow-up of melanocytic skin lesions: a study on behalf of the International Dermoscopy Society. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2013; 27:805-14. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jdv.12032
Stolz W, Schiffner R, Pillet L, et al. Improvement of monitoring of melanocytic skin lesions with the use of a computerized acquisition and surveillance unit with a skin surface microscopic television camera. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1996; 35:202-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0190-9622(96)90324-2
Skvara H, Teban L, Fiebiger M, et al. Limitations of dermoscopy in the recognition of melanoma. Arch Dermatol. 2005; 141:155-60. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1001/archderm.141.2.155
Lucas CR, Sanders LL, Murray JC, et al. Early melanoma detection: nonuniform dermoscopic features and growth. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2003; 48:663-71. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1067/mjd.2003.283
Bono A, Bartoli C, Cascinelli N, et al. Melanoma detection. A prospective study comparing diagnosis with the naked eye, dermatoscopy and telespectrophotometry. Dermatology. 2002; 205: 362-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1159/000066436
Kittler H, Guitera P, Riedl E, et al. Identification of clinically featureless incipient melanoma using sequential dermoscopy imaging. Arch Dermatol. 2006; 142:1113-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1001/archderm.142.9.1113
Argenziano G. The impact of dermoscopy on the management of pigmented skin lesions: the role of follow-up. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2005; 52:178. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaad.2004.06.032
Rubegni P, Cevenini G, Burroni M, et al. Objective follow-up of atypical melanocytic skin lesions: a retrospective study. Arch Dermatol Res. 2010; 302:551-60. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00403-010-1051-6
Kittler H, Pehamberger H, Wolff K, et al. Follow-up of melanocytic skin lesions with digital epiluminescence microscopy: patterns of modifications observed in early melanoma, atypical nevi, and common nevi. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2000; 43:467-76. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1067/mjd.2000.107504
Cabo H. Dermatoscopia. 2a ed. Buenos Aires: Ediciones Journal; 2012.
Carreras C, Zaballos P, Puig S, et al. Correlación histopatológica en dermatoscopia; lesiones melanocíticas y no melanocíticas. Criterios dermatoscópicos de nevus melanocíticos. Med Cutan Iber Lat Am. 2004; 32:47-60.
Ungureanu L, Şenilă S, Dănescu S, etal. Correlation of dermatoscopy with the histopathological changes in the diagnosis of thin melanoma. Rom J Morphol Embryol. 2013; 54:315-20.
Martín JM, Bella-Navarro R, JordáE. Vascularización en dermatoscopia. Actas Dermosifiliogr. 2012; 103:357-75. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ad.2011.11.005
Menzies SW, Gutenev A, Avramidis M, et al. Short-term digital surface microscopic monitoring of atypical or changing melanocytic lesions. Arch Dermatol. 2001; 137:1583-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1001/archderm.137.12.1583
Gandini S, Sera F, Cattaruzza MS, et al. Meta-analysis of risk factors for cutaneous melanoma, III: family history, actinic damage and phenotypic factors. Eur J Cancer. 2005; 41:2040-59. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca.2005.03.034
Gandini S, Sera F, Cattaruzza MS, et al. Meta-analysis of risk factors for cutaneous melanoma, II: sun exposure. Eur J Cancer. 2005; 41:45-60. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca.2004.10.016
Gandini S, Sera F, Cattaruzza MS, et al. Meta-analysis of risk factors for cutaneous melanoma, I: common and atypical naevi. Eur J Cancer. 2005; 41:28-44. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca.2004.10.015
Haenssle HA, Kraus SL, Brehmer F, et al. Dynamic changes in nevi of a patient with melanoma treated with vemurafenib: importance of sequential dermoscopy. Arch Dermatol. 2012; 148:1183-5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1001/archdermatol.2012.2649
Haenssle HA, Korpas B, Hansen-Hagge C, et al. Selection of patients for long-term surveillance with digital dermoscopy by assessment of melanoma risk factors. Arch Dermatol. 2010; 146:257-64 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1001/archdermatol.2009.370