The Cost of Reviewing for Free: The Invisible Work that Sustains Science

Authors

  • Alfredo Eymann Universidad Hospital Italiano image/svg+xml , Revista del Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Universidad Hospital Italiano. Buenos Aires, Argentina https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7509-3721
  • Mariana Rapoport Universidad Hospital Italiano image/svg+xml , Revista del Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Universidad Hospital Italiano. Buenos Aires, Argentina https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5350-825X
  • Daniel Matusevich Universidad Hospital Italiano image/svg+xml , Revista del Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Universidad Hospital Italiano. Buenos Aires, Argentina

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51987/Rev.Hosp.Ital.B.Aires.v46i3.1372

Keywords:

Editorial, Peer review, Scientific publishing, Artificial intelligence, Publication ethics, Scientific evaluation, Editorial responsibility

Abstract

Peer review is an essential, highly specialized, and largely unpaid task that supports the quality of scientific publishing. With the growing use of artificial intelligence, the challenge is to define legitimate and transparent applications that assist reviewers without replacing their expert judgment or responsibility.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Benos DJ, Bashari E, Chaves JM, et al. The ups and downs of peer review. Adv Physiol Educ. 2007;31(2):145-152. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1152/advan.00104.2006

Tennant JP, Dugan JM, Graziotin D, et al. A multi-disciplinary perspective on emergent and future innovations in peer review. F1000Res. 2017;6:1151. DOI: https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.12037.3

Grande Ratti MF, Mollerach S, Perez Manelli R. La revisión por pares en ciencias de la salud. Rev Hosp Ital B.Aires. 2025;45(2):e0000351. DOI: https://doi.org/10.51987/rev.hosp.ital.b.aires.v45i2.351

Aczel B, Szaszi B, Holcombe AO. A billion-dollar donation: estimating the cost of researchers' time spent on peer review. Res Integr Peer Rev. 2021;6(1):14. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s41073-021-00118-2

International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. Recommendations for the conduct, reporting, editing, and publication of scholarly work in medical journals. Philadelphia, PA: American College of Physicians; updated Jan 2026 [citado 2026 sep 9]. Disponible en: https://www.icmje.org/recommendations/.

Penabad-Camacho L, Penabad-Camacho MA, Mora-Campos A, et al. Declaración de Heredia: principios sobre el uso de inteligencia artificial en la edición científica. Rev Electrón Educare. 2024;28(S):1-10. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15359/ree.28-S.19967

Downloads

Published

2026-09-18

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable

How to Cite

1.
Eymann A, Rapoport M, Matusevich D. The Cost of Reviewing for Free: The Invisible Work that Sustains Science. Rev Hosp Ital B.Aires [Internet]. 2026 Sep. 18 [cited 2026 Sep. 19];46(3):e0001372. Available from: https://ojs.hospitalitaliano.org.ar/index.php/revistahi/article/view/1372

Most read articles by the same author(s)

<< < 1 2