Antimicrobial resistance and intensive swine production
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.51987/revhospitalbaires.v42i2.181Keywords:
intensive farming, antimicrobials, public health, antimicrobial resistanceAbstract
Introduction: it is estimated that the impact of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) will generate an increase of 10 million deaths by 2050, being reflected to a greater extent in low-income countries. 70% of the annual use of antimicrobials is concentrated in agroveterinary but not in human health. Considering the presence of AMR in ranchers and agricultural workers is essential for early public health actions.
Methods: using the PRISMA methodology, bibliography was searched in different sources until October 2020. Systematic reviews, meta-analyses, clinical trials and observational studies were prioritized to determine AMR in pig workers. Eight studies of the 990 found have been included.
Results: the rate of colonization by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) in farming workers was higher than the general population. MRSA prevalence was significantly higher in workers who reported direct contact with animals. And also in those workers of intensive farms compared to those of extensive farms. The same situation is observed in swines, in which the prevalence of AMR in intensive farming was significantly higher than in extensive farming. The association between the supply of antibiotics in intensive farming workers and the presence of AMR was also significant. Farms with more than 1,250 swines had a higher prevalence of AMR (p<0.001). The MRSA phenotype found in swine, agricultural workers, and the environment was the same.
Conclusions: there is scientific evidence of an association between agricultural production in intensive livestock farming and AMR in swine and farming workers. There aren't Argentine studies of epidemiological surveillance in farming workers.
Downloads
References
Zunino P. Historia y perspectivas del enfoque “Una Salud.” Veterinaria. 2018;54(210):46-51. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29155/VET.54.210.8
Owens FN, Gill DR, Secrist DS, et al. Review of some aspects of growth and development of feedlot cattle. J Anim Sci. 1995;73(10):3152-3172. https://doi.org/10.2527/1995.73103152x. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2527/1995.73103152x
Organización de las Naciones Unidas para la Alimentación y la Agricultura. Comisión de Recursos Genéticos para la Alimentación y la Agricultura. Situación de los recursos zoogenéticos mundiales para la alimentación y la agricultura: resumen [Internet]. Roma: FAO; 2007 [citado 2021 nov 15]. 42 p. Disponible en: https://www.fao.org/3/a1260s/a1260s.pdf.
Lhermie G, Gröhn YT, Raboisson D. Addressing antimicrobial resistance: an overview of priority actions to prevent suboptimal antimicrobial use in food-animal production. Front Microbiol. 2017;7:2114. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2016.02114. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2016.02114
O’Neill J. Antimicrobial resistance: tackling a crisis for the health and wealth of nations. London: Review of Antimicrobial Resistance; 2014. 16 p.
Landecker H. Antibiotic resistance and the biology of history. Body Soc. 2016;22(4):19-52. https://doi.org/10.1177/1357034X14561341. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1357034X14561341
Antimicrobianos. WHONET – Argentina [Internet]. Buenos Aires: Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Infecciosas (INEI) ANLIS “Dr. Carlos G. Malbrán”; [2021] [citado 2021 nov 15]. Disponible en: http://antimicrobianos.com.ar/category/resistencia/whonet/.
Argentina. Ministerio de Agricultura, Ganadería y Pesca. Resolución N° 591: Programa Nacional de Vigilancia de la Resistencia a los Antimicrobianos en Animales [Internet]. Buenos Aires: el Ministerio; 2015 [citado 2022 may 4]. Disponible en: http://servicios.infoleg.gob.ar/infolegInternet/anexos/255000-259999/256048/norma.htm.
Garegnani LI, Rosón-Rodríguez P, Garrote V, et al. Feedlots y resistencia antimicrobiana: revisión bibliográfica [presentación] Internet]. Buenos Aires: [2020] [citado 2021 nov 15]. Disponible en: https://hiba.hospitalitaliano.org.ar/archivos/noticias_archivos/46/archivos/REVISION%20FEEDLOTS%20Y%20RAM.pdf.
Parisi A, Caruso M, Normanno G, et al. MRSA in swine, farmers and abattoir workers in Southern Italy. Food Microbiol. 2019;82:287-293. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fm.2019.03.003. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fm.2019.03.003
McCrackin MA, Helke KL, Galloway AM, et al. Effect of antimicrobial use in agricultural animals on drug-resistant foodborne campylobacteriosis in humans: a systematic literature review. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. 2016;56(13):2115-2132. https://doi.org/10.1080/10408398.2015.1119798. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10408398.2015.1119798
Porrero MC, Wassenaar TM, Gómez-Barrero S, et al. Detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in Iberian pigs. Lett Appl Microbiol. 2012;54(4):280-285. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1472-765X.2012.03207.x. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1472-765X.2012.03207.x
Huang E, Gurzau AE, Hanson BM, et al. Detection of livestock-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus among swine workers in Romania. J Infect Public Health. 2014;7(4):323-332. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jiph.2014.03.008. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jiph.2014.03.008
Reynaga E, Navarro M, Vilamala A, et al. Prevalence of colonization by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus ST398 in pigs and pig farm workers in an area of Catalonia, Spain. BMC Infect Dis. 2016;16(1):716. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12879-016-2050-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12879-016-2050-9
Pirolo M, Visaggio D, Gioffrè A, et al. Unidirectional animal-to-human transmission of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus ST398 in pig farming; evidence from a surveillance study in southern Italy. Antimicrob Resist Infect Control. 2019;8:187. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13756-019-0650-z. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13756-019-0650-z
Liu Z, Zhang Z, Yan H, et al. Isolation and molecular characterization of multidrug-resistant Enterobacteriaceae strains from pork and environmental samples in Xiamen, China. J Food Prot. 2015;78(1):78-88. https://doi.org/10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-14-172. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-14-172
Deckert A, Gow S, Rosengren L, et al. Canadian Integrated Program for Antimicrobial Resistance Surveillance (CIPARS) Farm Program: results from finisher pig surveillance. Zoonoses Public Health. 2010;57 Suppl 1:71-84. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1863-2378.2010.01356.x. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1863-2378.2010.01356.x
GlobalSurg Collaborative. Surgical site infection after gastrointestinal surgery in high-income, middle-income, and low-income countries: a prospective, international, multicentre cohort study. Lancet Infect Dis. 2018;18(5):516-525. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1473-3099(18)30101-4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1473-3099(18)30101-4
European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC); European Food Safety Authority (EFSA); European Medicines Agency (EMA). ECDC/EFSA/EMA second joint report on the integrated analysis of the consumption of antimicrobial agents and occurrence of antimicrobial resistance in bacteria from humans and food-producing animals: Joint Interagency Antimicrobial Consumption and Resistance Analysis (JIACRA) Report. EFSA J. 2017;15(7):e04872. https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2017.4872. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2017.4872
Argentina. Servicio Nacional de Sanidad y Calidad Agroalimentaria. Resolución 22/2019: APN-PRES#SENASA - Productos veterinarios: prohibición de elaboración, distribución, importación, uso y tenencia [Internet]. Buenos Aires: Boletín Oficial de la República Argentina; 2019 ene 11 [citado 2021 nov 15]. Disponible en: https://www.boletinoficial.gob.ar/detalleAviso/primera/200151/20190115.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Revista del Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
