The Experience of a Drug Evaluation Committee at a University Hospital

Authors

  • Ana P. Gómez Comité de Evaluación de Fármacos e Insumos médicos, Hospital Italiano. Argentina https://orcid.org/0009-0000-7046-4669
  • María F. Filloy Comité de Evaluación de Fármacos e Insumos médicos, Hospital Italiano. Argentina
  • Roxana M. Beragua Comité de Evaluación de Fármacos e Insumos médicos, Hospital Italiano. Argentina https://orcid.org/0009-0004-7024-8471
  • Nicolás A. Chiarante Farmacia Ambulatoria, Hospital Italiano. Argentina https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6026-2529
  • Mariana A. Burgos Secretaría de Investigación Área no patrocinada, Hospital Italiano. Argentina.
  • Karina E. Alvarez Comité de Evaluación de Fármacos e Insumos médicos, Hospital Italiano. Argentina
  • Gabriela Buela Comité de Evaluación de Fármacos e Insumos médicos, Hospital Italiano. Argentina https://orcid.org/0009-0007-1039-1032
  • Luis A. Di Giuseppe Comité de Evaluación de Fármacos e Insumos médicos, Hospital Italiano. Argentina

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51987/Rev.Hosp.Ital.B.Aires.vi.431

Keywords:

Pharmacy and Therapeutics Committee, Technology Assessment, Pharmacy Service, Hospital Administration, Drug Committees

Abstract

Introduction: The exponential development of innovative drugs poses challenges to healthcare systems in ensuring equitable access to new treatments. At the hospital level, Drug Evaluation Committees (DECs) in each institution analyze the evidence on the effectiveness, safety, and cost of new drugs and make recommendations tailored to their specific contexts. Our objective is to describe the DEC's activity at a university hospital.

Materials and Methods: This cross-sectional study was undertaken at a university hospital. The evaluations made between 2017 and 2023 were analyzed. We used descriptive statistics to quantify the number of evaluation requests received, the drugs incorporated, requesting departments, and the medications' ATC classification.

Results: The DEC began its activities in 2011 and is comprised of a team of 13 healthcare professionals. During the study period, 111 requests for drug inclusion were received, of which 90 (81.1%) were approved and incorporated into the institutional formulary. The Internal Medicine Department submitted 60 (54%) requests, 26 (23%) of those came from the Oncology Section.

Conclusions: The DEC plays a central role in incorporating new drugs into the institutional formulary, especially in critical areas such as Oncology, addressing the growing demand for evaluating innovative treatments.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

World Health Organization. Promoting rational use of medicines [Internet]. Geneva: WHO; 2024 [citado 2024 dic 16]. Disponible en: https://www.who.int/activities/promoting-rational-use-of-medicines

Fernández MBT, Fernández JMD. Análisis en la selección de medicamentos, acercamiento tecnológico y farmacológico. RevistaeSalud.com. 2013;9(34):8.

Holloway K, Green T. Comités de farmacoterapia: guía práctica [Internet]. Ginebra Organización Mundial de la Salud; 2003 [citado 2024 dic 16]. Disponible en: https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/69224/WHO_EDM_PAR_2004.1_spa.pdf.

Sampietro-Colom L, Lach K, Pasternack I, et al. Guiding principles for good practices in hospital-based health technology assessment units. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2015;31(6):457-465. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266462315000732. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266462315000732

Gagnon MP. Hospital-based health technology assessment: developments to date. Pharmacoeconomics. 2014;32(9):819-824. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40273-014-0185-3. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40273-014-0185-3

Lipska I, Di Bidino R, Niewada M, et al. Overcoming barriers in hospital-based health technology assessment (HB-HTA): International Expert Panel Consensus. Healthcare (Basel). 2024;12(9):889. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare12090889. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare12090889

Norwegian Institute of Public Health, WHO Collaborating Centre for Drug Statistics Methodology. ATC/DDD Index [Internet]. Oslo: NIPH; 2024 [citado 2024 ago 13]. Disponible en: https://atcddd.fhi.no/atc_ddd_index/.

Pérez-Velasco Rodríguez D, Castro Armas R, Villegas Vélez A, et al. Sistema de información sobre categorías farmacológicas. Rev Cubana Farm. 2001;35(2):144–151.

Argentina. Ministerio de Salud. Anexo II. Manual de procedimientos para el funcionamiento de la CONETEC [Internet]. Buenos Aires: el Ministerio; 2023 [citado 2024 dic 23]. Disponible en: https://www.argentina.gob.ar/sites/default/files/anexo_ii._manual-procedimiento-funcionamiento-conetec.pdf.

Organización Panamericana de la Salud. Métodos y aplicación de la evaluación de tecnologías sanitarias adaptativa (ETSa) webinario 43 [Internet]. Washington, DC: OPS; 2024 spt 26 [citado 2024 dic 23]. Disponible en: https://www.paho.org/es/noticias/26-9-2024-metodos-aplicacion-evaluacion-tecnologias-sanitarias-adaptativa-etsa-webinario.

Scott EC, Baines AC, Gong Y, et al. Trends in the approval of cancer therapies by the FDA in the twenty-first century. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2023;22(8):625-640. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41573-023-00723-4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41573-023-00723-4

Published

2025-07-18

How to Cite

1.
Gómez AP, Filloy MF, Beragua RM, Chiarante NA, Burgos MA, Alvarez KE, et al. The Experience of a Drug Evaluation Committee at a University Hospital. Rev Hosp Ital B.Aires [Internet]. 2025 Jul. 18 [cited 2026 Aug. 21];45(3):e0000431. Available from: https://ojs.hospitalitaliano.org.ar/index.php/revistahi/article/view/431

Most read articles by the same author(s)