Virtual Course on Qualitative Research for Primary Care Professionals
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
Introduction: training in qualitative research is a key component of continuing education for Primary Health Care (PHC) professionals, as it strengthens methodological competencies and contributes to professional development. The aim was to describe the implementation and systematization of a qualitative research course, highlighting challenges, decisions, and lessons learned, as well as participants’ feedback.
Materials and methods: a virtual course consisting of two synchronous sessions, held in 2023 during evening hours, with a participatory methodology based on real-life examples. It was financially supported by the Argentine Federation of Family and General Medicine. Teaching fees were covered, but the course was offered free of charge to members of the scientific society. Attendance was recorded, an anonymous post-session survey was administered, and certificates granting credits for specialty recertification were issued.
Results: despite 39 pre-registered participants, only 41% attended, with 18 participants in the first synchronous session and 10 in the second. Most participants were from the provinces of Córdoba, Buenos Aires, and Misiones. Almost all respondents indicated they would likely apply what they had learned and would recommend the activity to colleagues. Overall satisfaction with the practical component and the interactive, participatory format was highlighted, although suggestions included improving the readability of some slides and adjusting the pace of the presentation. Three certificates of completion were issued (to those who submitted an individual asynchronous assignment on time), and 16 certificates of participation (without assessment).
Conclusion: the academic proposal was well received; participants valued the theoretical-practical methodology and the interactive approach, which fostered exchange and participation. Despite the initial interest reflected in pre-registrations, actual attendance suggests the need to explore barriers to participation in free training activities. The virtual format facilitated the inclusion of professionals from different provinces, and the small group size encouraged active participation. Feedback identified areas for improvement that could be optimized in future editions.
Downloads
Article Details
Section
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
References
Lacalle Zalduendo C, Pujol Ozonas C. Mentoría e integración social en la universidad: el aprendizaje por servicio en un proyecto del grado de periodismo. Educ XX1. 2019;22(2):289-308.
Busby KR, Draucker CB. Mentoring in academic nursing from the perspectives of faculty mentors. Nurs Educ Perspect. 2024;45(4):213-218.
Busby KR, Draucker CB, Reising DL. Exploring mentoring and nurse faculty: an integrative review. J Prof Nurs. 2022 ;38:26-39.
Haas DM, Hadaie B, Ramirez M, et al. Resident research mentoring teams: a support program to increase resident research productivity. J Grad Med Educ. 2023;15(3):365-372.
Elizondo CM, Giunta DH, Bernaldo de Quirós FG, et al. La investigación clínica en residencias de medicina interna de la Argentina. Facilitadores y barreras. Medicina (B Aires). 2012;72(6):455-60.
Ferreira JC, Godoy I, Pizichinni M, et al. Building research capacity in Latin America and in Brazil: the MECOR program. J Bras Pneumol. 2022;47(6):e20210501.
Ferreira JC, Pizzichini MMM. The MECOR program: almost three decades inspiring and improving respiratory clinical research in Brazil and across the globe. J Bras Pneumol. 2023;49(3):e20230213.
Terrasa S, Roni C, Rosli N, et al. Introducción a la mentoría en investigación y principales marcos teóricos para comprender y explicar sus procesos. Evid Actual Pract Ambul. 2019;22(1):1-4.
Carter AE, Anderson TS, Rodriguez KL, et al. A program to support scholarship during internal medicine residency training: impact on academic productivity and resident experiences. Teach Learn Med. 2019;31(5):552-565.
Terrasa S, Durante E. Perfiles de mentoría en investigación y evidencia de sus beneficios. Evid Actual Pract Ambul. 2020;22(4):e002007.
Suárez DH. Relatos de experiencia, saber pedagógico y reconstrucción de la memoria escolar. Educ Rev. 2011;27(1):387-416.
Grande Ratti MF, Herrera AG, Juana C, et al. Curso de investigación en Atención Primaria de la Salud: experiencia sobre módulo de búsqueda bibliográfica y gestores de citas. Arch Med Fam Gen. 2023;20(3):37-47.
Grande Ratti MF, Murature D, Del Roscio AS, et al. Ética en la investigación cualitativa. Rev Hosp Ital B.Aires 2024;44(1):e0000295.
del Jesús Aguilar Ponce L, Zambrano LC. Uso didáctico de las aulas virtuales en la enseñanza-aprendizaje. TE&ET. 2022;(32):e12.
Al-Balas M, Al-Balas HI, Jaber HM, et al. Correction to: Distance learning in clinical medical education amid COVID-19 pandemic in Jordan: current situation, challenges, and perspectives. BMC Med Educ. 2020;20(1):513. Errata en: BMC Med Educ. 2020;20(1):341.
Morán-Barrios J. New professionals for a new society. Responses from a medical education perspective: competency-based medical education. Rev Asoc Esp Neuropsiq. 2013;33(118):385-405.
Grande Ratti MF, Kiblisky Elizalde V, Burgos MA, et al. Aprendizaje en investigación clínica: experiencia de enseñanza virtual con estudiantes de medicina. Rev Hosp Ital B.Aires. 2023;43(4):191-199.
Morcke AM, Dornan T, Eika B. Outcome (competency) based education: an exploration of its origins, theoretical basis, and empirical evidence. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2013;18(4):851-863.
Baranchuk A, Bayés-de Luna A, Farina JM. Equidad intergeneracional en ciencia y educación médica. Rev Interam Cardiol. 2024;1(1):3-5.
Buist AS, Parry V. The American Thoracic Society methods in epidemiologic, clinical, and operations research program. A research capacity-building program in low- and middle-income countries. Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2013;10(4):281-289.