Utilization of Outpatient medical services modeling: an application of structural equation modeling on an urban middle class population with healthcare insurance.
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
Introduction: Structural equation modeling (SEM) is a valuable tool for guiding decision-making by allowing researchers to identify relationships between different variables and explain the behavior of more abstract variables. This is particularly relevant in understanding the factors that influence an individual's likelihood of consulting the healthcare system, where demographic, social, and psychological factors play a role.
The present study proposes an explanatory model of outpatient medical service utilization in an urban middle-class population with health insurance, examining the relationships between demographic, social, and self-perceived health variables.
Methods: A longitudinal prospective cohort study was conducted using a structural equation model. Two cross-sectional surveys were initially conducted at different time points, followed by longitudinal analysis that incorporated the information obtained from both cross-sectional surveys.
Results: The use of outpatient medical services was explained in the following order according to their strength of association: CPS (coefficient of 0.57), the use of services in the previous period (0.23), self-perceived health in the last period (-0.15), and family problems from the last period (0.08). The remaining variables did not have a statistically significant association.
Conclusions: The completion of the CPS is the variable with the greatest explanatory power for the variability in outpatient health service utilization among urban middle-class individuals with health insurance and high levels of education. This finding could have significant implications for healthcare management, informing strategies to ensure the sustainability of the healthcare system through rational resource allocation.
Downloads
Article Details
Section
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
References
Zhu S, Dong T, Luo X. A longitudinal study of the actual value of big data and analytics: the role of industry environment. Int J Inform Manag. 2021;60:102389. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2021.102389.
Dias da Costa JS, Facchini LA. Utilização de serviços ambulatoriais em Pelotas: onde a população consulta e com que freqüência. Rev Saúde Pública. 1997; 31(4):360-369.
Krasnik A, Hansen E, Keiding N, et al. Determinants of general practice utilization in Denmark. Dan Med Bull. 1997;44(5):542-546.
Zebiene E, Kairys J, Zokas I. Paciento medicinines konsultacijos lūkesciu priklausomumas nuo socialiniu bei demografiniu paciento charakteristiku [Influence of patient's social and demographic characteristics on patient's expectations for medical consultation]. Medicina (Kaunas). 2004;40(5):467-474.
Mendoza-Sassi R, Béria JU. Utilización de los servicios de salud: una revisión sistemática sobre los factores relacionados. Cad Saúde Pública. 2001;17(4):819-832. https://doi.org/10.1590/s0102-311x2001000400016.
Parkerson GR Jr, Broadhead WE, Tse CK. Perceived family stress as a predictor of health-related outcomes. Arch Fam Med. 1995;4(3):253-260. https://doi.org/10.1001/archfami.4.3.253.
Fernández de la Hoz K, León DA. Self-perceived health status and inequalities in use of health services in Spain. Int J Epidemiol. 1996;25(3):593-603. https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/25.3.593.
Kronenfeld JJ. Provider variables and the utilization of ambulatory care services. J Health Soc Behav. 1978;19(1):68-76.
Escobedo Portillo MT, Hernández Gómez JA, Estebane Ortega V, et al Modelos de ecuaciones estructurales: características, fases, construcción, aplicación y resultados. Cienc Trab. 2016;18(55):16-22.
Streiner DL. Figuring out factors: the use and misuse of factor analysis. Can J Psychiatry. 1994;39(3):135-140. https://doi.org/10.1177/070674379403900303.
Hair JF. Multivariate data analysis. 8th ed. Andover, Hampshire: Cengage; 2019.
Kaiser HF. A second generation little jiffy. Psychometrika. 1970;35(4):401-415. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02291817.
Hattie J. Methodology review: assessing unidimensionality of tests and itenls. Appl Psychol Meas. 1985;9(2):139-164. https://doi.org/10.1177/014662168500900204.
Burga León A. La unidimensionalidad de un instrumento de medición: perspectiva factorial. Rev Psicol. 2006;24(1): 53-80.
Streiner DL. A checklist for evaluating the usefulness of rating scales. Can J Psychiatry. 1993;38(2):140-148. https://doi.org/10.1177/070674379303800214.
Alonso J, Prieto L, Antó JM. La versión española del SF-36 Health Survey (Cuestionario de Salud SF-36): un instrumento para la medida de los resultados clínicos. Med Clin (Barc). 1995;104(20):771-776.
Bellón Saameño JA, Delgado Sánchez A, Luna del Castillo JD, et al. Validez y fiabilidad del cuestionario de función familiar Apgar-familiar. Aten Primaria. 1996;18(6):289-296.
Mills RJ, Grasmick HG, Morgan CS, et al. The effects of gender, family satisfaction, and economic strain on psychological well-being. Fam Relat. 1992; 41(4):440-445. https://doi.org/10.2307/585588.
Blanch JM, Sahagún M, Cantera L, et al. Cuestionario de bienestar laboral general: estructura y propiedades psicométricas. Rev Psicol Trabaj Orgán. 2010;26(2):157-170. https://doi.org/10.5093/tr2010v26n2a7.
Granero M, Perman G, Vázquez Peña F, et al. Validación de la versión en español de la Escala de Red Social Lubben-6. Rev Fac Cien Med Univ Nac Córdoba. 2020;77(4):296-300. https://doi.org/10.31053/1853.0605.v77.n4.28775.
George D, Maller P. SPSS for windows step by step: a simple study guide and reference, 17.0 update. 10th ed. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon; 2010.
Gutiérrez Doña B. Modelos lineales estructurales: conceptos básicos, aplicaciones y programación con LISREL. San José, CR: Universidad de Costa Rica. Instituto de Investigaciones Psicológicas; 2008. (Cuadernos metodológicos; 2).
White KL, Williams TF, Greenberg BG. The ecology of medical care. N Engl J Med. 1961;265:885-892. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM196111022651805.
Last JM, Adelaide DP. The iceberg: 'completing the clinical picture' in general practice. 1963. Int J Epidemiol. 2013;42(6):1608-1613. https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/dyt113.
Gutiérrez Doña EB. Coping with stress at work: a longitudinal study on health outcomes and quality of life [dissertation]. Berlin: Freien Universität. Fachbereich Erziehungswissenschaft und Psychologie; 2003.
Schröder K. Self-regulation competence in coping with chronic disease. New York: Waxmann; 1997.
Krogsbøll LT, Jørgensen KJ, Gøtzsche PC. General health checks in adults for reducing morbidity and mortality from disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019;1(1):CD009009. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD009009.pub3.
Kopitowski KS. Prevención cuaternaria: se pueden y se deben limitar los daños por la actividad sanitaria. Rev Hosp Ital B.Aires.2013;33(3): 90-95.
Granero M, Velázquez A. Medicalización de la vida y daño poblacional: revisión bibliográfica no sistematizada. Rev Hosp Ital B.Aires. 2020; 40(4):208-218.
Castillo-Riquelme M, Zárate V. La evaluación económica en salud. Rev Méd Chile. 2010;138( supl 2):67.
Tafani R, Gaspio N, Acevedo G. Producción hospitalaria y ley de cuidados inversos en Argentina. Rev Salud Pública (Córdoba). 2006; 10(2):8-30.
Porter ME. Value-based health care delivery. Ann Surg. 2008;248(4):503-509. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0b013e31818a43af.