Ethical deliberations about research in the area of education: about a case
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
A research team led by the first author of this article proposed to translate into Spanish, adapt cross-culturally and validate a questionnaire to assess the competence of those who do research mentoring. Since it was not a clinical investigation, initially, the research team downplayed ethical deliberation, assuming that this type of research could be exempted from being evaluated by an Independent Ethics Committee. However, after reviewing the specialized literature and several discussion sessions with experts in research ethics, the opinion of the team changed. This article aims to share this deliberative experience with any team involved in education research.
Downloads
Article Details
Section
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
References
Fleming M, House S, Hanson VS, et al. The Mentoring Competency Assessment: validation of a new instrument to evaluate skills of research mentors. Acad Med. 2013; 88(7):1002-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0b013e318295e298
Egan-Lee E, Freitag S, Leblanc V, et al. Twelve tips for ethical approval for research in health professions education. Med Teach. 2011; 33(4):268-72. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3109/0142159X.2010.507715
Council of the British Educational Research Association. Ethical Guidelines for Educational Research [Internet]. London; 2011. Pp. 1-11. Disponible en: www.bera.ac.uk
García Rillo A. Aspectos éticos de la investigación en educación médica. Investig en Educ Medica. 2012; 1(1):28-34. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22201/fm.20075057e.2012.01.00007
San Martín Ramírez V. Presencia implícita y explícita de temas éticos en investigaciones y ensayos educativos actuales. Rev Mex Investig Educ. 2007; 12(35):1289-308.
Soto Aparicio F, Gutiérrez Orozco J, Maestre Preciado N. Reflexiones sobre ética mínima. Rev Derechos y Valores. 2005; 8(16):227-40.
Lolas F, Quezada A, Rodríguez E. Investigación en Salud. Dimensión Ética. CIEB, Universidad de Chile;2006. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4067/S1726-569X2005000100002
Ministerio de Salud de la Nación. Presidencia de la Nación. Guía para investigaciones en salud humana. Buenos Aires: Ministerio de Salud de la Nación Argentina; 2008. P. 1-47.
Comisión Nacional para la protección de sujetos humanos de investigación biomédica y de comportamiento. Informe Belmont. Principios éticos y directrices para la protección de sujetos humanos de investigación. 1979. Pp. 1-13.
Emanuel E. ¿Qué hace que la investigación clínica sea ética? Siete requisitos éticos. En: Pellegrini AMR(editor). Investigación en Sujetos Humanos: Experiencia Internacional. Santiago de Chile: OPS/OMS; 1999. Pp. 33-46.
Mondragón-Barrios L. Consentimiento informado: una praxis dialógica para la investigación. Rev Invest Clin. 2009; 61:73-82.
Fleming M, House S, Hanson VS, et al. The Mentoring Competency Assessment: validation of a new instrument to evaluate skills of research mentors. Acad Med. 2013; 88(7):1002-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0b013e318295e298
Goldacre B. How to Get All Trials Reported: Audit, Better Data, and Individual Accountability. PLoS Med 2015; 12(4): e1001821. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1001821