Medical residents’ perceptions regarding skill supervision by senior staff physicians
Main Article Content
Abstract
Introduction. The ultimate goal of medical education during residency is skill development. In order for this to occur, tutors must often reflect on their own teaching activity and experiences. The aim of this study was to evaluate how the residents of the Obstetrics Department of the Hospital Italiano of Buenos Aires (HIBA) perceive the supervision they receive from their elder staff. Materials and Methods. We developed an open non-standardized questionnaire detailing relevant aspects of resident supervision. The questions were specifically oriented towards the global aspects of the supervision process. Results. Fourteen questionnaires were analyzed. In general, 11 out of 14 described their supervision as “adequate” in terms of availability of advisory and consultation opportunities, constant supervision during surgical procedures and an encouraging learning environment. Several weaknesses were observed regarding supervision during active call duty (5/14). In general, a favorable balance is noted between resident autonomy and senior availability for consult. With regards to feedback, they all concur in saying that timing is key (ideally feedback should be offered in close proximity to the activity that is being supervised) and point out that this is not always the case (6/14). Formative assessments are globally considered adequate for resident evaluation (8/14). Most surveys suggest use of simulation activities and clinical case workshops regarding basic obstetric practice scenarios (9/14). Comments. The development of this questionnaire has given us great insight towards our residents’ thoughts regarding clinical teaching and supervision. Results show that supervision is in general regarded as a positive experience and the learning environment is perceived as pleasant and nurturing
Downloads
Article Details
Section

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
References
Harden RM, Crosby J. AMEE Guide No 20: The good teacher is more than a lecturer - the twelve roles of the teacher. Med Teach. 2000; 22(4):334-47.
Perkins D. El aprendizaje pleno. Buenos Aires: Editorial Paidós; 2010.
Bain K. Lo que hacen los mejores profesores de Universidad. 2.a ed. Valencia: PUV; 2007.
ten Cate O. Guía sobre las actividades profesionales confiables. FEM. 2017; 20(3):95-102.
Durante E. La enseñanza en el ambiente clínico: principios y métodos. Revista de Docencia Universitaria. 2012; 10:149-75.
Giannasi S, Durante E. La enseñanza clínica: el caso de la recorrida de sala. Rev Hosp Ital B. Aires. 2012; 32(3):121-6.
Launer J. Understanding Medical Education: Evidence, Theory and Practice. Cap. 8: Supervision, mentoring and coaching. New Jersey: Wiley-Blackwell: 2010. pp. 111-22.
Alves de Lima AE. Devolución Constructiva: Una estrategia para mejorar el aprendizaje. Medicina (Bs. As.). 2008; 68:88-92.
Ker J, Bradley P. Simulation in medical education. In: Launer J. Understanding medical education: evidence, theory and practice. New Jersey: Wiley-Blackwell; 2010.
Hamui-Sutton A, Enríquez-López P, Hernández-Becerril C y cols. ¿Qué opinan los residentes sobre sus profesores? Un enfoque cualitativo. Educ Med. 2016; 19(1):9-18.
Geoffrey N. Research in clinical reasoning: past history and current trends. Med Educ. 2005; 39:418-27.
Ruiz Moral R y cols. El portafolio del libro del especialista en Medicina de Familia en formación: grado de implementación y opiniones de residentes y tutores 2 años después de su implantación en una unidad docente. Aten Primaria. 2009; 41(11):592-9.
Aranda Sánchez M. Encuestas de satisfacción: una oportunidad para mejorar. Rev Clin Esp. 2014; 214(4):175-234.