Predictors of success after decannulation in crittically ill adult patients: a retrospective cohort study
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
Introduction: the tracheostomy remains a very common surgical procedure done in the intensive care unit (ICU). The process of decannulation is of scientific interest with its associated factors not being sufficiently studied.
Objectives: to describe the clinical and epidemiological characteristics of the population and their relationship to effective decanulation. To report the cumulative incidence of decannulation failure and success. To analyze independent risk factors associated with decannulation failure.
Materials and methods: the present was a retrospective cohort of adult patients in the ICU at Hospital Italiano de San Justo who required tracheos- tomy during their in-hospital stay. Epidemiological variables were recorded before ICU admission and during their hospital stay using data from the electronic medical record. The inclusion period was 2 years long. We used descriptive statistics and logistic regression models to compare the proportion of patients who could be decannulated versus those who could not.
Results: 50 patients were enrolled in the present study. Their mean age was 66 (±15.5) years and 66% of patients were male. 21 patients (42%) achieved to be decannulated. The cumulative incidence of decannulation failure was 4.77% (95% CI: 0.85-22.87). Median time from weaning to decannulation was 17 days. In univariate analysis, statistically significant differences were found in ICU admission diagnosis (p<0.001) and hospital discharge alive (p<0.001) when comparing decannulated versus not decannulated patients. In multivariate logistic regression analysis, ICU admission diagnosis was found to be an independent predictor of decannulation failure (p<0.01).
Conclusions: clinical ICU admission diagnosis was an independent predictor associated with decannulation failure. This could be related to differences in baseline morbidity and clinical condition of these patients compared with surgical patients. However, no individual morbidities or clinical conditions were found to be associated in decannulation failure.
Downloads
Article Details
Section
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
References
O’Connor HH, Kirby KJ, Terrin N, et al. Decannulation following tracheostomy for prolonged mechanical ventilation. J Intensive Care Med. 2009; 24(3):187-94. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0885066609332701
Engels PT, Bagshaw SM, Meier M, et al. Tracheostomy: from insertion to decannulation. Can J Surg. 2009; 52(5):427-33.
Stelfox H, Hess D, Schmidt U. A North American Survey of Respiratory Therapist and Physician Tracheostomy Decannulation Practices. Respir Care. 2009; 54(12):1658-64. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/cc6802
Tobin AE, Santamaria JD. An intensivist-led tracheostomy review team is associated with shorter decannulation time and length of stay: a prospective cohort study. Crit Care. 2008; 12:R 48. doi:10.1186/cc6864. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/cc6864
Epstein SK. Late complications of tracheostomy. Respir Care. 2005; 50:542-9.
Heffner JE, Miller KS, Sahn SA. Tracheostomy in the intensive care unit. Part 2: Complications. Chest. 1986; 90:430-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1378/chest.90.3.430
Rumbak MJ, Newton M, Truncale T, et al. A prospective, randomized, study comparing early percutaneous dilational tracheostomy to prolonged translaryngeal intubation (delayed tracheostomy) in critically ill medical patients. Crit Care Med. 2004; 32:1689-94. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/01.CCM.0000134835.05161.B6
Dunham CM, Ransom KJ. Assessment of early tracheostomy in trauma patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am Surg. 2006; 72:276-81 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/000313480607200316
Engels P, Bagshaw S, Meier M, et al. Tracheostomy: From insertion to decannulation. Can J Surg. 2009; 52(5): 427-33.
Heffner J. Tracheostomy decannulation: marathons and finish lines. Crit Care. 2008; 12(2):128. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/cc6833
Villalba D, Lebus J, Quijano A, et al. Retirada de la cánula de traqueostomía. Revisión bibliográfica. Revista Argentina de Terapia Intensiva. 2014; 31(1).
Da Lozzo A, Smith DE, Giannasi S, Figari M, Vassallo B. Traqueostomía percutánea: experiencia inicial del Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires. 81.º Congreso Argentino de Cirugía. Buenos Aires, 2010.
Chelluri L, Rotondi A, Sirio C, et al. Donahoe M, Pinsky M. 2-month mortality and functional status of critically ill adult patients receiving prolonged mechanical ventilation. Chest. 2002; 121:549-58. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1378/chest.121.2.549
Scrigna M, Plotnikow G, Feld V, et al. Decanulación después de la estadía en UCI: Análisis de 181 pacientes traqueostomizados. Rev Am Med Resp. 2013; 13(2):58-63.
Diaz Ballve P, Villalba D, Andreu M, et al. Decanular. Factores predictores de dificultad para la decanulación: Estudio de cohorte multicéntrico. Rev Am Med Resp. 2017; 17(1):12-24.
Leung R, MacGregor L, CampbellD, et al. Decannulation and survival following tracheostomy in an intensive care unit. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2003; 112(10):853-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/000348940311201005
Hernández G, Fernández R, Sánchez-Casado M, et al. Tracheostomy tube in place at intensive care unit discharge is associated with increased ward mortality. Respir Care. 2009; 54:1644-52.
Stelfox H, Crimi C, Berra L, Noto A, Schmidt U, Bigatello L. Determinants of tracheostomy decannulation: an international survey. Crit Care. 2008; 12(1): R26. doi: 10.1186/cc6802. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/cc6802
Choate K, Barbetti J, Currey J. Tracheostomy decannulation failure rate following critical illness: a prospective descriptive study. Aust Crit Care. 2009; 22:8-15. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aucc.2008.10.002