The Current Challenges of Scientific Publishing in Medicine: a View From the South

Main Article Content

Daniel Matusevich
Alfredo Eymann

Abstract

In three years, the editorial landscape has changed radically: the pandemic, AI, and a crisis of scientific trust demand a rethinking of practices. From Latin America, editing science is an ethical, political, and clinical act, requiring care, critical thinking, and commitment to local contexts in the face of global challenges.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

Section

Editorial

How to Cite

1.
Matusevich D, Eymann A. The Current Challenges of Scientific Publishing in Medicine: a View From the South. Rev. Hosp. Ital. B.Aires [Internet]. 2025 May 30 [cited 2025 Oct. 25];45(2):e0001277. Available from: https://ojs.hospitalitaliano.org.ar/index.php/revistahi/article/view/1277

References

Himmelstein, D. S., Parra, C., Rajpurkar, P., & Beam, A. L. (2023). Publication practices and responsible use of generative AI in the scientific literature. Nature, 620(7972), 321–323.

Kleinert S, Wager E. Responsible research publication: international standards for editors: a position statement developed at the 2nd World Conference on Research Integrity [Internet]. En: Mayer T, Steneck N, (eds). Promoting research integrity in a global environment. Singapore, 2010 July 22- 24. Singapore: Imperial College Press, World Scientific Publishing; 2011. p. 317-328 [citado 2025 may 28]. Disponible en: https://muj.journals.ekb.eg/article_92889_dd2ada0127c05eafd859449616a36975.pdf.

Sokal A, Bricmont J. Imposturas intelectuales. Barcelona: Paidós; 1999.

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >>