Differences Between Group and Individual Care Systems in Neurorehabilitation: Where Are We Headed?
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
The demand for rehabilitation is growing; however, studies demonstrating the superiority of the group format do so through statistical significance, not clinical significance. Individual rehabilitation may provide better patient-therapist interaction and, therefore, may benefit some individuals.
Downloads
Article Details
Section
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
References
Hidding A, van der Linden S, Boers M, Gielen X, et al. Is group physical therapy superior to individualized therapy in ankylosing spondylitis? A randomized controlled trial. Arthritis & Rheumatism: Official Journal of the American College of Rheumatology. 1993;6(3):117-25.
https://doi.org/10.1002/art.1790060303 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/art.1790060303
Robertson B, Harding KE. Outcomes with individual versus group physical therapy for treating urinary incontinence and low back pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2014;95(11):2187-98.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2014.07.005 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2014.07.005
Renner CI, Outermans J, Ludwig R, et al. Group therapy task training versus individual task training during inpatient stroke rehabilitation: a randomized controlled trial. Clin Rehab. 2016;30(7):637-48.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0269215515600206 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0269215515600206
Kang M, Bladon J, Sergio LE. Group format rehabilitation is equally effective as individual therapy in patients with surgically repaired rotator cuff tears. Physiother Res Int. 2020;25(1):e1795. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/pri.1795
King LA, Wilhelm J, Chen Y, et al. Effects of group, individual, and home exercise in persons with Parkinson's disease: a randomized clinical trial. Journal of Neurological Physical Therapy. 2015;39(4):204-12.
https://doi.org/10.1097/NPT.0000000000000101 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/NPT.0000000000000101
Sweeney KG, MacAuley D, Gray DP. Personal significance: the third dimension. Lancet. 1998;351(9096):134-6.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(97)06316-2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(97)06316-2
Van Kessel G, Hillier S, English C. Physiotherapists' attitudes toward circuit class therapy and 7 day per week therapy is influenced by normative beliefs, past experience, and perceived control: A qualitative study. Physiother Theory Practice. 2017;33(11):850-8.
https://doi.org/10.1080/09593985.2017.1357152 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09593985.2017.1357152
Bennett L, Luker J, English C, et al. Stroke survivors' perspectives on two novel models of inpatient rehabilitation: seven-day a week individual therapy or five-day a week circuit class therapy. Disable Rehabil. 2016;38(14):1397-406.
https://doi.org/10.3109/09638288.2015.1103788 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3109/09638288.2015.1103788
Lahelle AF, Øberg GK, Normann B. A group-based, individualized physiotherapy intervention for people with multiple sclerosis-A qualitative study. Physiother Res Int. 2018;23(4):e1734.
https://doi.org/10.1002/pri.1734 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/pri.1734
Morris ZS, Wooding S, Grant J. The answer is 17 years, what is the question: understanding time lags in translational research. JR Soc Med. 2011;104(12):510-20.
https://doi.org/10.1258/jrsm.2011.110180 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1258/jrsm.2011.110180