The importance of digital dermoscopy in follow-up of melanocytic lesions to the early diagnosis of melanoma
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
Digital dermoscopy is a tool that allows the early diagnosis of melanomas, through the long-term follow up of pigmentary skin lesions. We report three cases of patients with high-risk of melanoma, in which the diagnosis had been made by morphological, arquitectural and pigmentary changes observed by the digital dermoscopy follow-up
Downloads
Article Details
Section
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
References
Rigel DS. Epiluminescence microscopy in clinical diagnosis of pigmented skin lesions?. Lancet. 1997; 349:1566-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(05)61625-X
Argenziano G, Soyer HP. Dermoscopy of pigmented skin lesions- a valuable tool for early diagnosis of melanoma. Lancet Oncol. 2001; 2:443-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(00)00422-8
Haenssle HA, Korpas B, Hansen-Hagge C, et al. Selection of patients for long-term surveillance with digital dermoscopy by assessment of melanoma risk factors. Arch Dermatol. 2010; 146:257-64. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1001/archdermatol.2009.370
Malvehy J, Puig S. Follow-up of melanocytic skin lesions with digital total-body photography and digital dermoscopy: a two-step method. Clin Dermatol. 2002; 20:297-304. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0738-081X(02)00220-1
Salerni G, Terán T, Puig S, et al. Meta-analysis of digital dermoscopy follow-up of melanocytic skin lesions: a study on behalf of the International Dermoscopy Society. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2013; 27:805-14. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jdv.12032
Stolz W, Schiffner R, Pillet L, et al. Improvement of monitoring of melanocytic skin lesions with the use of a computerized acquisition and surveillance unit with a skin surface microscopic television camera. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1996; 35:202-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0190-9622(96)90324-2
Skvara H, Teban L, Fiebiger M, et al. Limitations of dermoscopy in the recognition of melanoma. Arch Dermatol. 2005; 141:155-60. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1001/archderm.141.2.155
Lucas CR, Sanders LL, Murray JC, et al. Early melanoma detection: nonuniform dermoscopic features and growth. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2003; 48:663-71. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1067/mjd.2003.283
Bono A, Bartoli C, Cascinelli N, et al. Melanoma detection. A prospective study comparing diagnosis with the naked eye, dermatoscopy and telespectrophotometry. Dermatology. 2002; 205: 362-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1159/000066436
Kittler H, Guitera P, Riedl E, et al. Identification of clinically featureless incipient melanoma using sequential dermoscopy imaging. Arch Dermatol. 2006; 142:1113-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1001/archderm.142.9.1113
Argenziano G. The impact of dermoscopy on the management of pigmented skin lesions: the role of follow-up. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2005; 52:178. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaad.2004.06.032
Rubegni P, Cevenini G, Burroni M, et al. Objective follow-up of atypical melanocytic skin lesions: a retrospective study. Arch Dermatol Res. 2010; 302:551-60. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00403-010-1051-6
Kittler H, Pehamberger H, Wolff K, et al. Follow-up of melanocytic skin lesions with digital epiluminescence microscopy: patterns of modifications observed in early melanoma, atypical nevi, and common nevi. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2000; 43:467-76. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1067/mjd.2000.107504
Cabo H. Dermatoscopia. 2a ed. Buenos Aires: Ediciones Journal; 2012.
Carreras C, Zaballos P, Puig S, et al. Correlación histopatológica en dermatoscopia; lesiones melanocíticas y no melanocíticas. Criterios dermatoscópicos de nevus melanocíticos. Med Cutan Iber Lat Am. 2004; 32:47-60.
Ungureanu L, Şenilă S, Dănescu S, etal. Correlation of dermatoscopy with the histopathological changes in the diagnosis of thin melanoma. Rom J Morphol Embryol. 2013; 54:315-20.
Martín JM, Bella-Navarro R, JordáE. Vascularización en dermatoscopia. Actas Dermosifiliogr. 2012; 103:357-75. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ad.2011.11.005
Menzies SW, Gutenev A, Avramidis M, et al. Short-term digital surface microscopic monitoring of atypical or changing melanocytic lesions. Arch Dermatol. 2001; 137:1583-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1001/archderm.137.12.1583
Gandini S, Sera F, Cattaruzza MS, et al. Meta-analysis of risk factors for cutaneous melanoma, III: family history, actinic damage and phenotypic factors. Eur J Cancer. 2005; 41:2040-59. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca.2005.03.034
Gandini S, Sera F, Cattaruzza MS, et al. Meta-analysis of risk factors for cutaneous melanoma, II: sun exposure. Eur J Cancer. 2005; 41:45-60. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca.2004.10.016
Gandini S, Sera F, Cattaruzza MS, et al. Meta-analysis of risk factors for cutaneous melanoma, I: common and atypical naevi. Eur J Cancer. 2005; 41:28-44. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca.2004.10.015
Haenssle HA, Kraus SL, Brehmer F, et al. Dynamic changes in nevi of a patient with melanoma treated with vemurafenib: importance of sequential dermoscopy. Arch Dermatol. 2012; 148:1183-5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1001/archdermatol.2012.2649
Haenssle HA, Korpas B, Hansen-Hagge C, et al. Selection of patients for long-term surveillance with digital dermoscopy by assessment of melanoma risk factors. Arch Dermatol. 2010; 146:257-64 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1001/archdermatol.2009.370