Virtual Learning in the Management of Frail Older Adults in Home Care in home care

Main Article Content

Javier Matías Saimovici
https://orcid.org/0009-0006-9777-8725
María F. Grande Ratti
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8622-8230
Silvana M. Scozzafava
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7364-2758
Gastón Perman
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5606-8210
Cinthya D. Alvarez
https://orcid.org/0009-0009-5155-5501
Laura E. Magallán
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5430-1499
Cristian M. Gallo Acosta
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8696-5289
María F. Cunha Ferré
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6797-3198
Valeria P. Colombo
https://orcid.org/0009-0004-2357-7918
Mónica B. Senillosa
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2748-0801

Abstract

Introduction: the rise of home health care (HHC), driven by system advantages, an aging population, and patient preferences, demands specialized training. A university postgraduate course titled "Introduction to the Management of the Frail Elderly in HHC" was designed. This study analyzed student performance, demographics, and feedback.


Materials and Methods: the course was virtual, asynchronous, self-paced, free of charge, aimed at healthcare professionals and hosted on the Moodle platform. It was structured into four units: Introduction to HHC systems, HHC Admission, Home assessment, and Discharge from HHC. Teaching methods included audiovisual resources, supplemental readings, and self-assessment activities. The course granted 30-hour certificates. The course awarded certificates for 30 hours after the approval of the 4 self-assessment activities included throughout the training. A cross-sectional study was conducted, including students enrolled between January and August 2025. Data were gathered from educational platform analytics and voluntary feedback surveys from those who completed the course.


Results: a total of 1,250 students enrolled, and 218 completed and passed the course (17.44%), with a mean final score of 90.76/100. Participants were 73% female and 82% from Argentina, with medicine and nursing as the primary professions. Feedback was received from 120 graduates (55% response rate). Regarding satisfaction, 99.17% felt the materials facilitated learning, 100% found the virtual campus easy to use, and 98.31% stated the course significantly aided their professional development. The highest-rated aspects were the online modality (64.60%), lecture quality (59.29%), and content (49.56%). Suggestions were received to integrate more rehabilitation topics.


Conclusion: this experience was highly valued by graduates and contributed significantly to HHC training, promoting educational accessibility. The completion rate, typically lower in self-administered formats, was low due to a lack of engagement or early dropout. Increasing retention in self-managed modalities remains a challenge, potentially requiring enhanced faculty support if resources permit.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

Section

Medical Education

How to Cite

1.
Saimovici JM, Grande Ratti MF, Scozzafava SM, Perman G, Alvarez CD, Magallán LE, et al. Virtual Learning in the Management of Frail Older Adults in Home Care in home care. Rev Hosp Ital B.Aires [Internet]. 2026 Jun. 23 [cited 2026 Jul. 7];46(2):e0001315. Available from: https://ojs.hospitalitaliano.org.ar/index.php/revistahi/article/view/1315

References

United Nations. Department of Economic and Social Affairs. World population prospects 2022: summary of results [Internet]. New York: United Nations; 2022 [citado 2026 may 17]. Disponible en: https://www.un.org/development/desa/pd/sites/www.un.org.development.desa.pd/files/wpp2022_summary_of_results.pdf.

Ogaz-González R, Corpeleijn E, García-Chanes RE, et al. Assessing the relationship between multimorbidity, NCD configurations, frailty phenotypes, and mortality risk in older adults. BMC Geriatr. 2024;24(1):355. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-024-04948-9

Edgar K, Iliffe S, Doll HA, et al. Admission avoidance hospital at home. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 20245;3(3):CD007491. Curioni C, Silva AC, Damião J, et al. The cost-effectiveness of homecare services for adults and older adults: a systematic review. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023;20(4):3373. Zimbroff RM, Ornstein KA, Sheehan OC. Home-based primary care: A systematic review of the literature, 2010-2020. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2021;69(10):2963-2972. Kim CO, Jang SN. Home-based primary care for homebound older adults: literature review. Ann Geriatr Med Res. 2018;22(2):62-72. Peres F, Blanco Centurión MP, Monteiro Bastos da Silva J, et al. Mapeo de la formación en salud pública en América Latina: perspectivas para las instituciones formadoras. Rev Panam Salud Pública. 2023;47:e25Ortega J, Hooshmand M, Foronda C, et al. Developing nurse leaders across the Americas: evaluation of an online nursing leadership course. Rev Panam Salud Pública. 2018;42:e152. Filipe HP, Silva ED, Stulting AA, et al. Continuing professional development: best practices. Middle East Afr J Ophthalmol. 2014;21(2):134-141. Dieser M, Sanz C, Zangara M. Metodologías para la evaluación de la autorregulación del aprendizaje en contextos educativos mediados por tecnología digital: una revisión sistemática. En: 17º Congreso de Tecnología en Educación & Educación en Tecnología (TE&ET 2022); 2022, jun 15-16; Entre Ríos, Argentina. La Plata: Red de Universidades con Carreras en Informática; 2022 [citado 2026 may 17]. Disponible en: http://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/handle/10915/139902.

Reyna Martínez LA, Campos Rivera M, Alpuche Miam EF, et al. Alfabetización digital en la formación médica con enfoque de atención primaria: contribución de la práctica en comunidad. LATAM Revista Latinoamericana de Ciencias Sociales y Humanidades. 2026;6(6):3071-3080. https://doi.org/10.56712/latam.v6i6.5118. DOI: https://doi.org/10.56712/latam.v6i6.5118

Gamage SH, Ayres JR, Behrend MB. A systematic review on trends in using Moodle for teaching and learning. IJ STEM Ed. 2022; 9:9. Galofré A, Wright AC. Índice de calidad para evaluar preguntas de opción múltiple. Rev Educ Cienc Salud. 2010;7(2):141-145. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-021-00323-x

Muljana PS, Luo T. Factors contributing to student retention in online learning and recommended strategies for improvement: a systematic literature review. J Inf Technol Educ Res. 2019;18:19-57. Friðriksdóttir, K. The impact of different modalities on student retention and overall engagement patterns in open online courses. Comput Assist Lang Learn. 2018;31(1-2):53-71. Shaikh UU, Asif Z. Persistence and dropout in higher online education: review and categorization of factors. Front Psychol. 2022;13:902070. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.902070

Xavier M, Meneses J. Dropout in online higher education: a scoping review from 2014 to 2018 [Internet]. Barcelona: ELearn Center, Universitat Oberta de Catalunya; 2020 jun [citado 2026 may 17]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7238/uoc.dropout.factors.2020

Martínez CK, Pereyra Duré JL, Chaz Sardi MC, et al. Caracterización de profesionales de medicina y enfermería de la provincia de Buenos Aires a partir del cruce de registros administrativos de la fuerza de trabajo. Rev Argent Salud Pública. 2024;16:e131.

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 3 > >>